Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Republic of China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Republic of China[edit]

Relisted. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead portal. No news updates or selected articles. Portal:Taiwan is much more little active. JJ98 (Talk) 17:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-- while the portal is out of date, it has gotten about 800 views per month for the past few months[1]. Perhaps it is still useful to some readers? --E♴(talk) 18:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I see that, the last news update was back in 2010, and no updates since. The Taiwan portal has viewed almost about 960 views per month[2], along with People's Republic of China portal which has almost 1,660 views per month, if the portal has no updates, then it might be likely to suggest to redirect to Portal:Taiwan since it has little activity. JJ98 (Talk) 02:35, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment what's wrong with a sporadically updated portal? ROC and Taiwan are not historically equivalent, being that ROC used to comprise all of China. The ROC portal should highlight that historical difference. 184.144.168.112 (talk) 05:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It appears that the ROC portal is less sporatically linked from mainspace compared to the Taiwan portal - this might be a contributor to the inactivity of the portal. Prior to reading this page, I didn't even know an ROC portal existed. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 07:11, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Portal:Taiwan per nom. --Klein zach 02:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep un-updated is not a reason for deletion - nor is the fact another one is better. Perhaps a note at Wikipedia:WikiProject China may led to some updating. I see they just made Portal:Shanghai so one can presume they like portals. Moxy (talk) 05:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:48, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.