Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Priyanka Chopra
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Certainly a dead portal; the creator seems to be the only user who's edited the page. No major improvements were made since it was created last February. —Vensatry (ping) 07:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- I was very busy lately. So, I couldn't give time to this. The portal will go through a big change this weekend. So, I think it will be fine.Krish | Talk 08:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as useless fan-made stuff. Wikipedia seriously needs to keep a check on "portal" subpages as there are borderline advertisements of celebrities. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oh really? LOL! Atleast give me a valid reason for it. First of all I don't think it should have been nominated for deletion in first place. If a topic is wide, it can have a portal and other things. And, you and the great Mr. Vensatry had problems with me. So I guess your voting doesn't count. Plus, why this sudden nomination? This was created in February and you suddenly realise now to delete. Why don't you admit you guys have nothing to do here other than fighting with me? Or you couldn't find any other chance to do that. But I'm definitely not interested.Krish | Talk 18:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- First you tell us a valid reason why this fancruft should exist. The rationale for deletion is pretty obvious. Your argument – 'why this sudden nomination? This was created in February and you suddenly realise now to delete.' – clearly tells that you haven't understood the rationale. As if we don't have any other job than to stalk and trouble you. Back to the point, the scope is just too narrow. We need to have a clear-cut rule, perhaps a consensus from the related Wikiprojects to allow these. —Vensatry (ping) 07:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oh really? LOL! Atleast give me a valid reason for it. First of all I don't think it should have been nominated for deletion in first place. If a topic is wide, it can have a portal and other things. And, you and the great Mr. Vensatry had problems with me. So I guess your voting doesn't count. Plus, why this sudden nomination? This was created in February and you suddenly realise now to delete. Why don't you admit you guys have nothing to do here other than fighting with me? Or you couldn't find any other chance to do that. But I'm definitely not interested.Krish | Talk 18:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.