Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Lake Van

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Lake Van

Overly narrow scope for a portal per WP:POG. Category:Lake Van contains 11 articles. The portal does include articles on some neighbouring cities in scope but it's still not enough to constitute a broad topic. Hut 8.5 16:11, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete adds nothing to the topic Legacypac (talk) 16:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Yet another narrow-focus portal created recently when creating portals has been fun and too easy. No reason to think that this one is needed. How many lakes of comparable size are there in ~~the United States or~~ the world? (Woops.) Does the completion date in late December 2018 indicate a race against the calendar and a self-imposed quota? (Yes?) Robert McClenon (talk) 18:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"A race against time" to create as many portals as possible [1] Legacypac (talk) 18:31, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.