Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Konami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Userfy on request; redirect at editorial discretion. Tikiwont (talk) 09:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Konami[edit]

Bare portal skeleton. Never expanded. Zetawoof_(ζ) 01:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep At least ask the apparently active editor what his plans are for a not very old skeleton. Collect (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or userfy. Andre (talk) 20:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or userfy. It seems like a portal that was set up and dropped all of a sudden. Perhaps the creator can do something with it. MuZemike 01:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to P:VG: The redirect would not cross namespace and the video games portal gives related information. Though, if consensus decides to delete, I certainly wouldn't oppose. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 21:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Delete - userfication would serve little purpose as the page consists only of the output of the portal skeleton template. If the creator wants to resurrect it and work on it they can just put a new skeleton in their userspace. Redirection to the VG portal sounds fair, although I would imagine searches for/links to the page would be very rare. Richard ⁰⁶¹² 18:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.