Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Jaws
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. In this case, there really is nothing in this portal that is worth tagging historical because there is nothing. bibliomaniac15 01:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Portal was created in October, 2006, and has had not a single edit since then. Portal creator is being notified of this discussion. John Carter 17:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Joe I 19:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 01:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
DeleteNo content, I suppose someone could go somewhere with this,but unless someone is going to - kill it.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 04:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)- Keep Poorly constructed, not maintained, are no reasons. If we did that with articles, I think at least three quarters of wikipedia would get deleted. It may change at any time (and now is a good oocasion, anybody showing some {{sofixit}} spirit will get a barnstar from me :)
- And a Sofixit Barnstar With Oak and Leaves for writing a WikiProject/Jaws/Policy/Do Not Create Articles About Quint's Backup Harpoon...--Victor falk 11:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Changing to No position. I agree with Victor in principle - but there is no history to preserve, there was a single edit, there is nothing that would be lost by deleting it. And this will definitely have to be somebody else's baby.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 01:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. feydey 08:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.