Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Government of the Philippines
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Abandoned portal loaded with errors and outdated content:
- DYK...that after the retirement of Artemio Panganiban last December 7, the current Chief Justice of the Philippines is Reynato Puno (pictured right)?
- Corrections: Puno was never pictured at the right, an artifact of copying the info from an actual DYK. He was appointed in 2007, not last Dec. He retired 9 years ago, so is not the current office holder.
- DYK...that the 2013 Philippine midterm elections will be scheduled this May 2013?
- Amazing old news!
- The "In the News" is all from 2016, so not news.
- There are a lot of redlinks in the articles list at the bottom.
- Portals need maintenance and this is not getting it so delete.
Legacypac (talk) 03:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as specified, and because of too many errors. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Question/
Administrator note @Legacypac: April 1st causes a lot of confusion around XfDs. I just want to confirm that this is a legitimate MfD and not a joke nomination? --TheSandDoctor Talk 03:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- I don't do joke nominations but this portal is a joke. Who is going to fix it after 12 years of being broken? Legacypac (talk) 03:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Legacypac: Thanks for clarifying and good to know. I figured as such but had to be sure.
--TheSandDoctor Talk 04:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Legacypac: Thanks for clarifying and good to know. I figured as such but had to be sure.
- I don't do joke nominations but this portal is a joke. Who is going to fix it after 12 years of being broken? Legacypac (talk) 03:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Just because it's broken doesn't mean it can't be fixed. EggRoll97 (talk) 07:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- You can't fix a track record of neglect for years. Nothing here gives me confidence this will be maintained going forward. Legacypac (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete clearly not being maintained, just get rid of it since no one wants to fix it and there is clearly zero interest. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:52, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.