Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Famous Slaves

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete — xaosflux ^Talk 01:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Famous Slaves[edit]

Created by a user who has rather acrimoniously left the project [1] [2]; it seems utterly inactive. Moreover it currently doesn't even contain a list of famous slaves; it's just a list of 6 articles, some e.g. York not even having anything to do with slavery... TheGrappler 19:44, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't see any point. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 18:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete This could be a useful portal, but it isn't one now. Given that it was created by a strange user, I am inclined to deletion, but only weakly. Xoloz 04:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, although a Portal:Slavery would be a nice thing to have. Christopher Parham (talk) 05:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete How could this be useful? It is far too narrow a subject. However, as Christopher states above, a Portal:Slavery might work.--cj | talk 03:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Xoloz and cj. --Tantalum T e lluride 04:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, way too narrow for a real Portal and obviously isn't even an attempt to be one. Portal:Slavery could work, as stated above, but this is just a link repository. Creator is a troll. —Cuivi é nen, Sunday, 2 April 2006 @ 22:26 (UTC)
Strong delete Hoort 21:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.