Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Dacia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
An ancient region now converted to an automated portal pulling in 70 views in 30 days. Meanwhile Dacia contains everything here and a whole lot more which attracted more editors, 157 watchers and 17,924 pageviews (30 days). Even with that activity the article has a big orange tag on it. Effort should be put into the article not a stripped down version of the article in portal space.
Portal:Ancient Rome already covers the scope. Legacypac (talk) 20:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Question - Is User:Terraflorin maintaining? Robert McClenon (talk) 03:17, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Also covered by Portal:Romania. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:19, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Old portal, 13 subpages, created 2012-11-11 13:28:05 by User:Terraflorin. A comment by a maintainer, if any, would be useful. Portal:Dacia. Pldx1 (talk) 14:36, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This topic does not meet the breadth-of-subject-area requirement of the WP:POG guideline. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:23, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.