Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Condoms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ~ Amory (u • t • c) 09:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Condoms[edit]

And just when you thought you saw it all in terms of portals... The scope here is a handful of condom brands and a few additional articles. Navbox generated portal with no value. Meszzy² (talk) 07:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 19 pages including everything Legacypac (talk) 08:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An automated portal, created 2018-09-07T06:42:55Z, only worth of an automated deletion: Portal:Condoms. Pldx1 (talk) 10:25, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Narrow topic. Not meets WP:POG.Guilherme Burn (talk) 12:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: small topic. Pun intended. SITH (talk) 14:25, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now now, it's not the size but how you use it. Legacypac (talk) 17:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Like using a small script to create thousands of portals from navboxes. Meszzy² (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Having been rebuked once about sexual humor on MFD, I will only say that this is another unneeded portal by TTH during the early part of the wave of reckless portal creation. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.