Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Chinese gardens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Chinese gardens[edit]

Portal:Chinese gardens (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete single-page portal on a narrow subject (failing the WP:POG guideline on that account); no enhanced main page features (DYK, news, quotes, featured content, collaboration tools). UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:14, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Yet another automated portal by the portal platoon on a narrow topic. We don't need these. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as failing WP:POG. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 15:15, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Narrow topic, fails WP:POG requirement that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Automated portal, 0 subpages, created 2018-12-31 06:58:49 by User:TTH, useless navigation tool, redundant to the existing articles and categories, and of lower quality: Portal:Chinese gardens. Pldx1 (talk) 18:20, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: unneeded, uncurated, unremarkable. SITH (talk) 12:30, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.