Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bread

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:47, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Bread[edit]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:17, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another crappy narrow scope portal. Portal:Bread gets 15 views a day compared to Bread which gets 1,393. CoolSkittle (talk) 18:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete silly portal idea because a nav box was available. Legacypac (talk) 20:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Bread should be eaten, not used as a doorstop. Overly narrow. Created during a period of reckless portal creation. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:25, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An automated portal, created 2018-08-14T09:58:11Z, only worth of an automated deletion. Pldx1 (talk) 07:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
nomination changed after my !vote Pldx1 (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]
Comment - Did You Know that the only DYK of this portal is about the Poulsbo Bread that was developed in 1974, from two lines in the Book of Ezekiel, and discontinued in 2011. But you can read a map, locate Poulsbo and go there, to Sluys' Bakery, and discover that "it would be a cool place to live". According to Wikipedia, this kind of miracle occurred at least once, in 2008. Holly Wikipedia, give us our bread ! Pldx1 (talk) 07:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. I found another overlapping topic and bundled it. Same editor. Also Portal:Sandwiches Portal:Hamburgers exist. Legacypac (talk) 14:27, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac: Thanks for bringing up those portals. I have bundled the hamburgers and sandwiches portals but removed the flatbreads one because it is already in the mass del nom by BHG. Also pinging Robert McClenon and Pldx1 to share their thoughts on the bundled portals. CoolSkittle (talk) 14:44, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The big nomination may go off the rails. She just pulled the expansion which I think included flatbreads. If there are logical bundles for a specific debate we should include all similar pages regardless of being part of a big nomination. The worse that happens is the page turns red part way through one of the debates. Legacypac (talk) 14:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. CoolSkittle (talk) 15:17, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the additions in this case (already having said that the bread should be eaten), but taking issue with User:CoolSkittle expanding the nomination on day two, because this can cause the discussion to go off the rails, which is where the train wreck metaphor comes in. Please don't expand nominations after they start. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. CoolSkittle (talk) 16:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We actually broke MFD with too many translutions yesterday and it remains broken not displaying the oldest discussions. We also have the issues of voter fatigue and 5,000 more portals to sort through. Therefore bundling should be encouraged wherever it makes sense to reduce the problems we are facing. Everyone is watching the nominations they comment on, and can weigh in if they don't like a bundled items for some reason. That's my two cents. Legacypac (talk) 23:44, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac, I agree with @Robert McClenon. The point is that bundling should be done at the point of nomination, or before any others have commented. Changing the scope of a nomination after discussion had begin is bad news. As you know, I recently tried doing it with a ping to every participant, and that met objections too ... but here you didn't notify anybody. This has been raised with you elsewhere. Please stop. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:10, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can get off my case about something that happened before your attempt to double the huge nomination. Legacypac (talk) 17:47, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Legacypac - You don't need enemies if you insult your friends. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:31, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Portal:Bread is an old-style portal of exceptionally poor quality. The others are just more drive-by portalspam by @The Transhumanist. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:13, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural: Two of the pages hadn't been tagged. I've tagged them now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:17, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

- Automated portal, 0 subpages, created 2018-08-14 09:58:11, to be deleted: Portal:Bread

- Automated portal, 0 subpages, created 2018-08-18 20:49:29, to be deleted: Portal:Hamburgers

- Automated portal, 0 subpages, created 2018-09-08 01:13:07, to be deleted: Portal:Sandwiches

Pldx1 (talk) 22:12, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.