Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Airbus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete all. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:09, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Airbus

Single company portal. Portal:Companies already exists. You can quickly tap selected images and articles to get a version of the portal with 4 indentical Airbus logos displayed. Scope is narrow at about 23 pages which includes wholly owned subs, divisions, JVs and people associated with the company at some point. Legacypac (talk) 23:39, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bombardier is also a single company portal, which is strike one. Only 13 product pages plus a few assorted other pages = too narrow which is strike two. Part of a mass creation of portals where ever a nav box can be found to harvest = strike 3.

Plus an intro that just says "Bombardier Aerospace (French: Bombardier Aéronautique) is a division of Bombardier Inc. It is headquartered in Dorval, Quebec, Canada.". Which is hardly very informative for the reader who needs and wants to know more than this. The aricle presents all the info about this company and its products much better on a single page with nice infobox.

Delete - As the nominator says, too narrow a focus, created recklessly. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:57, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Another unnecessary and not useful mass created portal. Meszzy² (talk) 07:04, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Too narrow of a subject for a portal. It already has its navbox, {{Airbus}}, and that seems adequate. --Deeday-UK (talk) 10:57, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An automated portal, created 2019-01-21T13:22:52Z, only worth of an automated deletion. Pldx1 (talk) 14:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This portal was created by a blocked sockpuppet. The other arguments for deletion are also valid. Not G5 because none of the accounts had been blocked at the time of portal creation. We need to ensure that other portals created by these socks are also washed with sodium hypochlorite. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:36, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Another aircraft manufacturer portal added, created at same time by same banned user. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:37, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Boeing too. Sorry I missed Boeing. Also bundling the number three aircraft manufacturer previously nominated for deletion on April 2 in the interest of reducing the number of open MfDs. The only discussion it had was Robert voting to delete. Legacypac (talk) 03:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fairchild is tagged under the big bundle but I've included it for completeness here Legacypac (talk) 20:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.