Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bandai Namco Holdings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:04, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Bandai Namco Holdings (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) DannyS712 (talk) 04:22, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Single company portal like many others deleted as too narrow, but created before the mass creation spree. Legacypac (talk) 23:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Keep: They're a notable video game developer and a large multi-national company, not too sure how it wouldn't be a suitable topic for a portal. Namcokid47 (talk) 23:38, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The basic idea is no individual company gets a portal. So Portal:Video games is a broad topic but a developer of video games is not. Portals get very few readers anyway so it is no big loss. Articles are where it's at. Legacypac (talk) 23:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"no individual company gets a portal" could you point me to where you found this, please? Namcokid47 (talk) 23:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Namcokid47: WP:MfD/P:BK is the precedent for this. –MJLTalk 18:44, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Much of the original work I put into that template has instead been nearly entirely replaced by higher ups, which was quite disappointing for me to see. I'll see if I can put some more effort into that portal, although I don't know if this thing will last that long for me to get on it, I'm rather busy. Namcokid47 (talk) 23:12, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your work was indeed replaced but I would not call an editor who is now community banned from creating portals and has a user talk full of deletion notices a "higher up" Legacypac (talk) 09:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 04:22, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.