Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In utero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It appears that the consensus is to keep the page, as a DAB. Pinging Bearian, Doc James, AngusWOOF, and SmokeyJoe to make sure what I did on the page is what you all intended. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In utero

Procedural timestamp. 04:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't know if this belongs to RfD, to make sure my nomination is submit successful, the nomination goes here. Because of the original text is transfer to wikt, So this should be a wikt soft redirect, however, there is an album with a close name. So I think it would be better to change this page to dab. Alcremie (talk) 13:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's worth it to restore the last substantive version, even. While obviously unsourced and limited, there is information that goes beyond what we see in the corresponding simple dictionary entry, and the article could and should be fleshed out. Abeg92contribs 15:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Treat as a DAB page. Uterus does not have a section suitable for a simple redirect. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:18, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Restore previous version which was made into a dictionary definition the day before it was up for RFD. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural note @IN, Abeg92, SmokeyJoe, and AngusWOOF: WP:Deletion venues -- [Articles for deletion is for] articles and other pages in the main namespace (e.g. disambiguation pages), excluding redirects. Given the number of participants, I have attempted to remedy the venue through a move to make the transition from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/In utero as painless as possible. Warmest regards, — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 05:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I would prefer to see it as a Speedy Keep WP:SK#1, no rationale for deletion. This discussion could be held on its talk page. RfD accepts any redirect discussion, but for AfD and MfD, "D" means "deletion". --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - @SmokeyJoe: If someone else wants to close it, I have no qualms with that. The water was a bit muddy between RfD and AfD because the hatnote made it not a true hard or soft redirect; on the other hand, MfD was certainly not the correct venue. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 05:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - I have no qualms on this page. I think the old version was OK, and ideally "in utero" will be given thorough coverage at Uterus, at which point:

In utero can become a redirect to In Utero (Nirvana studio album); In Utero (Nirvana studio album) can have hatnote pointing to Uterus#in utero.

--SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC) edited SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Keep and restore the definition as a disambig. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a dab. Bearian (talk) 20:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.