Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Vincent Parma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vincent Parma[edit]

Resume/self-advertisement, apparently by the subject himself. Based on his talk page comments, he seems unable or unwilling to distinguish between the tone suitable for one's MySpace or LinkedIn profile, and an actual article. If he is notable, you can't tell it from this unsalvagable froth. Orange Mike | Talk 04:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Either ignore, or tag {{db-g11}}. Here I would go G11. Blatant promotion, all sources are promotional, not reliable, or not independent. If the topic were to be notable, WP:TNT would apply. Due to the WP:Reference bombing, which makes reviewing hard work, I think it is not necessary to exhaustively evaluate every listed reference if the them is clear. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if not G11ed. Blatant self-promotion, non-notable, no reason to humor this. Don't see how this can just be ignored. —DIYeditor (talk) 05:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.