Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:True School Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted WP:CSD#G11 by JzG. JohnCD (talk) 16:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:True School Entertainment[edit]

This is going nowhere. The org has zero notability, there are no sources of any calibre in it or to be found, and, not that it makes a difference, it only has a facebook page. The draft is a barely concealed advert promoted by its owner, who seems to have washed his hands of it in this diff Fiddle Faddle 22:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This will never pass WP:GNG, and it's an advert that the user has implied they don't want anymore. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:30, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Winner 42 Talk to me! 22:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Besides the promotional writing, the article seems unlikely to ever satisfy our inclusion criteria. Having famous clients isn't enough; it must also receive coverage in sources deemed reliable, such as newspapers, books, or magazines. They don't have to be online or freely accessible, but they do have to exist. As far as I can tell, there's nothing out there. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Close as already deleted The page has already been deleted per the "G11" Speedy deletion criterion - Blatant promotion. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.