Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . RL0919 (talk) 20:40, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tre[edit]

Non-notable likely autobio that is being resubmitted without improvement. All primary sources. Legacypac (talk) 03:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It didn't look like an autobiography to me, but that it is not an important distinction.
Comment - Note that this draft was resubmitted after being Rejected, which isn't directly supported by AFC and requires tweaking the templates to override the action of the reviewer, which is a disruptive action.
Comment - User:Legacypac - Thank you for providing your suggestion on what to do about it:
Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 21:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I say suspected autobiography because of the really detailed but unreferenced coverage of his early life. That is often found in autobios. Topic is not notable anyway and the submitter does not get the message. Legacypac (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.