Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Walt Disney Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Walt Disney Company[edit]

Useless content fork that was a draft a while ago, why, I don't know. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:55, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Draftspace is intended for the creation of new articles and this subject already has a very prominent page. Also looks like the draft is just a copy of the existing article. If the user wanted to test tweaks or edits to the page then it belongs in the sandbox. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There is a category displaying all drafts tagged for AFC review that have the same name as articles. A few editors, including myself, review the drafts in this category. If the draft is the same as the article, I redirect the draft to the article. If they are both about the same subject but some of the content is different, I tag the draft to be merged into the article. This is a case where the draft appears to be the same as the article. I would redirect the draft to the article, but the MFD tag instructions say not to do that. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Sometimes a draft has the same name as an article because there are people with the same name. In that case the draft usually needs to be disambiguated. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Sometimes a draft has the same name as a redirect because the title redirects to a parent article, such as the song redirects to the album or the album redirects to the band. These submissions require judgment and are often controversial. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.