Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Duck Bros.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Duck Bros.[edit]

continued hoax re: The Simons Fuddle (talk) 01:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as mentioned, nothing else listed to suggest this is an encyclopedia article. SwisterTwister talk 02:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's nothing to even support they existed.--S Philbrick (Talk) 19:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not convinced this is a real thing. /wiae ★ /tlk 23:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - yes, this is a hoax. - tucoxn\^talk 16:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Definite WP:HOAX. As at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Patrick Johnson Five, which I've just had to pad out with seven other interrelated draft pages of equal unverifiability to the parent topic (four albums, a song and two band members), this is part of an ongoing pattern of hoaxery about completely unverifiable topics purporting the involvement of a completely unverifiable musician and television producer named "Patrick Johnson". A television series that aired for six seasons on The WB, for instance, would have garnered real reliable source coverage, and would not have been totally unverifiable — and everything in this massive pile of bulldroppings suffers from the exact same problem. Delete all. Bearcat (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.