Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Coolrok TV Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. MER-C 08:39, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Coolrok TV Network

Very heavy walled garden of shows all by User:Jaylen2020, all in draftspace and all without any reliable sources nor any AFC headers and none of which looks like there is any attempt to actually make these into functional articles rather than just using Wikipedia inappropriate as a WP:WEBHOST for all these shows on the YouTube channel. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Adding the following to the list:

Comment ...and the following:

The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk)

Delete all. Many, if not all, of these are YouTube videos. None of them have any indication whatever of notability. The editor's history suggests that there is probably no intention of ever making them into articles: it seems that he or she is using Wikipedia's draft space as a web host to hold pages for his or her personal use. (If that were done in userspace the pages would qualify for speedy deletion.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. No indication that any of these meet or could meet WP:GNG. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 13:34, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. No credible claim of notability. Fails the GNG and if this was a mainspace article it probably would qualify for CSD A7. --189.106.238.122 (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Above, I wrote "Many, if not all, of these are YouTube videos. None of them have any indication whatever of notability." Further investigation suggests that is even worse than that: at least some of them are not even YouTube videos: it seems that at least some of these pages are no more than fantasy articles about subjects which don't exist at all. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.