Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Starship SN11

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: redirect to Starship development history. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Starship SN11[edit]

This draft has been declined seven times by five different reviewers. There is no reason to think that this particular SpaceX test vehicle is about to receive significant coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - anything that is of value can be added to the main article, this particular version of the SN series is not special enough to need it's own article. This particular author also has a hard time following the suggestions of reviewers and enjoys repeatedly submitting duplication content forks. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like information that belongs in mainspace, but not as its own article. Why can’t I find an article on the SN series of starships? —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Starship development history is where the most pertinent information can be found. This particular draft consists nothing more then that of an overly detailed timeline for a single version of the vessel supported primarily by Twitter posts. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:20, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am the author. I have worked very hard on this, but I understand what you mean. It can be deleted. I will move some parts of it to Starship development history. Please reply here and on my talk page. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 15:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Starship development history. The topic is already in mainspace, do not duplicate topics in draftspace. Content forking is almost always better dealt with by redirecting, not deleting. If the article Starship development history is too large and a WP:SPINOUT is desired, use the talk page, and note that spinouts mean spinning out a large section, not a small section. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Starship development history#Starship SN11 per SmokeyJoe, which already covers this topic. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:43, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.