Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sebastien Lagree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sebastien Lagree[edit]

Non-notable individual with repeated submission to AfC, getting to the point of tendentious editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm confused as to why this page has been nominated for deletion. How can someone who created a global fitness brand, who holds more than 40 patents, and who is the only person in the country to hold patents for both fitness equipment and a method be deemed "non-notable?" This page has been nominated for deletion based upon "Tendentious editing," but perhaps if the editors were more thorough in their comments, used punctuation, and wrote more than "Google is not a source," or "Shortcuts are not needed, please remove them" the adjustments could have been made in one single edit instead of multiple drafts over several months. As far as "Google is not source," notable, independent, secondary sources referring to the subject's notability include The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Wall Street Journal, US Patent Office, Forbes magazine, the University of California at San Diego and many others. Please let me know what steps are needed to publish this page. Thank you. AdamstormAdamstorm (talk) 17:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- this is very obviously intended to be an advertisement for Mr Lagree and his business. Despite several declines, that pointed out that it's basically spam, the content is still very spammy. Wikipedia is not a billboard. Reyk _YO! 15:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promotion. Could be deleted per WP:CSD#G11. No third party sources. Even if notable, and quality independent sources were provided, WP:TNT would apply. Listing your achievements and patents is what makes a CV, not an encyclopedia page. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:53, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.