Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rajiv Ranjan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rajiv Ranjan[edit]

I came across this purported draft of an article, but it is IMO unequivocally just an un-notable person writing about himself, there is no chance or prayer of this ever passing notability guides. Evidence presented... 1) user has self-declared conflict-of-interest at User:Sat-cusat, showing the subject of the article and the Wiki user are one and the same. 2) Self-uploaded image of subject was deleted here. 3) User uploaded image of signature to Commons Wikipedia here, where it has been nominated for deletion. Summation, this is clear-cut self-promotion. Maybe it was done in good-faith, but as it is clearly a self-promoted subject of no notability, it should not remain even in Draft-form. Thank you for your consideration. Zaathras (talk) 01:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, ping for @Sat-cusat: the creator, and @Fastily: who deleted the image and warned the user against using the Wiki as a blog or web-service. Zaathras (talk) 01:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom - The author's argument at Files for Deletion for keeping the image is a case where a self-promoter makes the case against himself. But this is a content forum (so that we are discussing the draft and not the editor). Robert McClenon (talk) 01:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NOTCV. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
please hold on delete action. I understand, this article has very less coverage of passing notability compliance as of now but Can you please permit to keep it in draftspace as soon or later, it will get sufficient publicity and will have more references from reliable sources added to it. Thanks!!--Sat-cusat (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but there's nothing in this bio of an everyday IT guy that suggests he (and by "he" I mean "you", since this is clearly self-promotional) is just around the corner from international stardom. Or regional or even local stardom, for that matter. Zaathras (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.