Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rajiul Huda Dipto
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete and ECP salted. RL0919 (talk) 21:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Draft:Rajiul Huda Dipto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Draft:Rajiul Huda Dipto (2) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
These two identical promotional drafts have been created by now-blocked sockpuppet accounts. The subject may or may not be notable, but these drafts are not going to be worked on except maybe by more sockpuppets. Request ECP salting, so that there will be no resubmissions by sockpuppets, but an established editor can submit if the subject is notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - To answer a question in advance: Why not just let these drafts expire in six months? Sockpuppetry may keep them alive if they are not deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and salt Spammy useless promotional crud with socks involved. CoolSkittle (talk) 21:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and Salt Promotional and created by single purpose only account. Azkord (talk) 07:41, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and salt per nom Legacypac (talk) 16:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and salt per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.