Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Quiñenco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. (NAC) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Quiñenco[edit]

Consider for deletion. Been deleted twice - WP:G11 violation in this draft already. JustBerry (talk) 06:06, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Pro-forma. JustBerry, This article is being actively improved. WP:G13 is the CSD that revolves around AFC stale submissions. Please review the purpose of WP:DRAFT and WP:AFC. I don't see any of the other CSD rationale as appicable, so it makes sense to give this article space. Hasteur (talk) 23:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Whether or not an article meets G13 is totally besides the point. MfD is for the submissions that do not meet G13, but are otherwise useless. The ones that do meet G13 should be deleted by G13. DGG ( talk ) 23:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This one is not hopeless. The firm is notable. In fact, with the removal of one or two sentences, I think it would do in mainspace. DGG ( talk ) 23:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.