Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pokemon Planet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. RL0919 (talk) 19:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pokemon Planet[edit]

Thisis the sort of article which really should be removed very son after submission., not a week later. I bring it here because strictly speaking none of the speedy criteria really applies, though I would not think it unreasonable to use testpage DGG ( talk ) 06:45, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral - Doesn't need deleting yet. Test pages are normally considered not to apply in draft space. Drafts are drafts. We don't need to be deleting drafts simply because a vandal used the same IP address six weeks earlier. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - This seems to be a good faith attempt to write an article by what is probably a very young editor. The game is not notable and the draft is not encyclopedic, but there are no BLP/UPE/etc. issues here, just a not-so-good attempt at an article. Why not let G13 deal with it? SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 16:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment article hasn't been submitted yet but if it were, then I would have to tag it as CSD G11 advertising/promotion. It's a fan-made game of which no fan-made versions have any sort of presence on List of Pokemon video games, so unless the editor can come up with VG/RS reviews for it, it doesn't have much potential. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article was created less than a month ago. Did the nom reach out to the editor to see if the editor is still interested in developing it? I see no reason for deleting. Give it six months and if unedited, nom can propose speedy deletion or re-propose it here. --Doug Mehus T·C 14:14, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.