Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Paula E. Kirman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Paula E. Kirman[edit]

Draft being decline 10 times with seemingly no chance of becoming approved. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 00:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not WP:notable, not suitable for Wikipedia, no independent reviews.

Unfortunate AfC commenting system certainly didn't help here. The first comment (Onel5969 (talk) 14:08, 26 December 2014) was on point, but has become lost in its unintuitive location following many unhelpful following comments placed above. "Does not seem" and "Doesn't appear" are not useful or helpful comments to place on a draft, they are weak, sloppy, and non-actionable. Over all that time, it was begging for a clear statement "this topic is not suitable for Wikipedia" so that the author knows, for the first time, that they should give up on it. If the comments went to the talk page, it would have been so much easier for the author to have entered into conversation. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable and after 10 reviews a time sink, so under rules that complicate things I think we can delete it here at MFD rather than move it and nominate at AFD. jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.