Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ontario Association of Emergency Managers (OAEM)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ontario Association of Emergency Managers (OAEM)[edit]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stale and abandoned draft that won't become an article. Fails GNG and NCORP. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 23:56, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - @KGirlTrucker81: Notability guidelines do not apply to drafts, and shouldn't be the primary concern of mfd nominations; WP:NMFD. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 12:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Godsy: I know, but no improvements so far to make it notable. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability concerns are not a reason to bring it to MfD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. The whole point of draftspace is to allow editors the opportunity to work on desired articles, receiving feedback on notability or sourcing issues and hopefully making improvements in response to that feedback, so notability and sourcing problems are not in and of themselves reasons to bring an article to MFD. I'll admit that the needed improvements haven't been happening in this instance, but a draft is not deletable as "stale or abandoned" until six months have passed since the last content edit — but it's only been 4.5 months so far in this case. No prejudice against renomination on or after May 23 if the creator still hasn't returned to it by that time, but we're not at the deadline yet. Bearcat (talk) 17:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.