Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Obesity in South Korea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 15:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Obesity in South Korea[edit]

I might have issued a CSD for copyvio, but cannot trace the relevant sources, thus cannot trace the proportion of copyright material included. It seem safest, therefore, to bring it to XfD in order to seek to resolve this once and for all. If the draft is to be kept then the copyvios must be excised. Again the safest approach is the deletion of this draft, that it be rewritten from scratch Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 14:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete since, in addition to probable copyvio, this has been largely sitting around for a few years with mostly bot edits and tweaks. If someone wants to start this over, that would be good, but we don't need to burden them with this. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep and re-write if possible.Well-made draft and is somewhat referenced. I would suggest to keep and rewrite the draft, but delete some of the photos as it may violate the non-free content criteria, except for the video that should have been a still picture that is fair use for educational and encyclopedic purpose. Text is referenced by academic research and journals and some reliable sources, some are presumably not- this forms as a basis for the rewriting. Xingqiu • Talk 02:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, do not delete as a copyvio without real evidence of it being a copyvio. I do not consider this excise to require revdeletion. Beware copyright paranoia. If the copyright issue is excessively close paraphrasing, that is not the sort of thing that needs revdeletion. Of what's there now, given the interspersed referencing throughout, I consider it unlikely to be serious copyvio. If deleted, re-create with the reference list (there can be no copyright claim on a reference list), to allow anyone to start again. Do not delete for being old. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Timtrent: This seems like something that would have been better dealt with by listing it at WP:Copyright problems rather than MFD. I would suggest closing this and listing the page there, since that page has people who know how to handle possible or suspected copyright issues. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 15:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.