Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mukesh Bhatt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 07:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mukesh Bhatt[edit]

At this point this is a case of disruptive editing and submittal after 2 rejections and multiple attempts to remove prior declines and rejections. It's time to remove all versions of this. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

added the 2 other versions as a secondary edit. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all: This guy could be notable, and there could be non-English sources about him that aren't easily available online, and if those were theoretically added I might support keeping this. But this draft as it stands has no merit as a potential article, and it's not any other editor's responsibility to source the author's work for them. silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 19:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom and Silvia. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Partofthemachine (talk) 02:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and semi-protect, at least the ones in draft space. Protection would keep them safe from disruptive editing while giving less disruptive editors a chance to work on them. Zerbu ^💬 03:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate the editor's intent to fill in a bio, it should be noted that the exercise has resulted in showing the subject does not meet WP:ENT or WP:TOOSOON at this time, as his roles are not star-billing at all. No external news sources were provided, only IMDb-like databases. If kept, this should be merged to draft:Mukesh S. Bhatt since there is a notable film producer Mukesh Bhatt already in mainspace. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom. Tendentious resubmit after rejection, gaming the system with multiple resubmits, deleting AFC comments. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Seems helpful under the circumstances. —Alalch E. 17:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - This is a case of attempting to overrun the encyclopedia with spam. This is different from a simple non-notable stupid draft, because it is a case of disruption. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.