Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Minecraft plugins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep as a poor quality draft. Whpq (talk) 13:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Minecraft plugins

WP:NOTAHOWTO violation. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also NOTWEBHOST. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Minecraft modding where "plugins" which are also mods (Bukkit is a server-side mod) are covered in detail. This is not a NOTHOWTO violation. It does not include a list of steps to follow etc.—Alalch E. 10:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a violation of both WP:NOTAHOWTO and WP:NOTWEBHOST. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 12:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's a draft. Those are reasons to decline or reject the draft, not to delete it. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's just a harmless junk draft. It would have been deleted after 6 months regardless of whether this discussion took place or not. Waddles 🗩 🖉 17:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why bother? If it gets submitted for review, it will be declined. It will probably be deleted after six months anyways. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 23:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it is just apoor draft, per Robert McClenon. Actually the first sentence, explainig what a plug in does, may be merge and redirect? to the main article - Nabla (talk) 01:33, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to Minecraft modding instead, per Alalch E. (how the heck did I miss Alalch's vote...?) - Nabla (talk) 01:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It's strange to me how Wikipedia as an encyclopedia doesn't allow "How to" guides as historically this has been included with the written books. (World Book ect...) The only reason I can think of is to promote the underused "Wikibooks". - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.