Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Matthew Medney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Matthew Medney[edit]

This page has been created likely in return for undisclosed amounts of money, if you ask an admin, you can see that the creators user page (now deleted) even admits that they work with Matthew Medney, as I recall, the user page said they worked with or for Matthew Medney. Zippybonzo (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May I also add that the page was rejected at AFC because the draft had few reliable sources and did not meet notability guidelines. Zippybonzo (talk) 19:15, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This draft was not rejected at AFC, but declined. Some editors prefer precision in usage. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:41, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Needed declining or rejecting, and was declined. The sanctions for undisclosed paid editing do not normally include quick deletion of drafts, because Wikipedia requires that work by paid editors be reviewed, not blackholed. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:41, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.