Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Marcel Katz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:16, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Marcel Katz[edit]

The references here appear to be essentially press releases. DGG ( talk ) 07:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. The author is creating multiple copies of this draft that will never be accepted. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - subject seems to fail WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG. While sources do exist that cover the subject, none are particularity in-depth enough to establish the subject's notability. WP:PRIMARY is another issue, as most of the sources cited in the article consist of interviews and as such are not independent of the subject. Another noteworthy issue with the article is its use of Forbes contributor pieces; one [1] is clearly marked as an opinion piece, while the several published articles on the Italian version of Forbes are attributed to Marco Rubino, a writer who is named as a contributor here [2]. As such, these sources should be considered unreliable given Forbes contributors do not express the opinions of Forbes staff. SamHolt6 (talk) 00:50, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.