Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Louise FitzRoy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Louise FitzRoy[edit]

Draft:Louise FitzRoy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This also is in article space as Louise FitzRoy. Either the article should be kept or the article should be deleted. Either way, we don't need this draft.

Author has been blocked as spam account promoting the subject. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Excessively promotional draft which has been duplicated by the draft creator in article space. Note that I have PRODed the article in article space. Safiel (talk) 05:42, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to the mainspace article, and delete with deletion of the mainspace article. I agree with the PROD of the article. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note Main space article was deleted per WP:PROD earlier today. Safiel (talk) 19:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The promotion accusations seem a bit strong, and there is a bit of WP:BITE. For the author, I'd say it is better to write an article on the organisation before writing an article on the organisations founder, if the founder is only notable for founding the organisation. Be warned that Wikipedia is very sensitive and reative to being used for promotion, where the sources are not independent of the subject.
An article on From Paddock to Plate might be more successful, I see it is currently a draft (Draft:From Paddock to Plate). I think it is easily confused with Paddock to Plate, are the two related in any way? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.