Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kissing Candice (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . RL0919 (talk) 18:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kissing Candice (band)[edit]

A page tagged "promising draft" with substandard sourcing and unverified claims. Since the tagger wants an MfD instead of G13 I'm bringing the page for discussion as I clear out all promising drafts Legacypac (talk) 01:25, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please ping the tagger, User:Godsy, so that he can state his case, which is what he implied he would do by placing the tag. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The draft was WP:Reference bombed. The first four sources are unsuitable for demonstrating notability. The draft has a promotion angle. Where a new topic has a promotion angle, I believe the onus should be on the authors to point to the 2 or 3 best sources. They have not, therefore delete. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:33, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 06:27, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Not stale yet. Hasn't been idle for 6 months. No need to delete proactively. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It will never go stale according to some editors interpretation of the supposed G13 defeating tag. Legacypac (talk) 18:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.