Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kerry Wiley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kerry Wiley[edit]

Fails WP:GNG without significant coverage by reliable sources. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 16:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Draft, and contains no BLP vios, so I don't see the harm in letting it linger in case RSs start talking about it more. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 09:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per previous discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability/Archive_58#RfC:_Does_WP:N_apply_to_drafts_in_userspace_or_draftspace.3F,

GNG guidelines do not apply in Draft space. Newimpartial (talk) 05:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - See Wikipedia:Drafts#Deleting a draft. And also there is no BLP violation since it is properly sourced. 103.1.70.70 (talk) 07:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.