Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kabiru Adeniyi Kulukulu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . Primefac (talk) 16:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kabiru Adeniyi Kulukulu[edit]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a couple sections - including his opinion on vote buying - but there is just nothing I can see that is notable enough to justify an article. Seems like a vanity page. Legacypac (talk) 18:39, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral - This draft contains too much opinion, either those of the submitter or those of the subject. It also shows no likelihood of being made ready for article space. However, it is too early to delete, in my opinion, unless it is resubmitted more. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep WP:SK#1 no reason offered for deletion. Notability is not required for draftspace. “Seems like” statements by nominators are just for wasting others time. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Seems like" is my assessment of why this was created. If you agree you should vote to delete.

I don’t agree that it crosses a NOTPROMOTION line, “vanity” is not a net-productive word to use (see Wikipedia:Vanity), and I see no reason why this needs MfD attention beyond any other draft of unclear notability. “Speedy keep” applies. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:29, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pure personal puffery. I see no chance whatever of an article. No significant chance of notability ,and that is a real reason for deletion of a draft. DGG ( talk ) 01:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with DGG that this is puffery, and it has been submitted and rejected multiple times. --RL0919 (talk) 21:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-viable draft & bio spam. Might as well delete. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.