Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:InstallAware Software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: preserve and move to Wikipedia:InstallAware Software as an essay. (non-admin closure) feminist 11:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:InstallAware Software[edit]

Draft:InstallAware Software (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 17:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined 11 times -- which is close to a record -- by 9 different reviewers. Hopelessly promotional. DGG ( talk ) 03:42, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Preserve - Not necessarily keeping it in draftspace, but I feel this draft has grown to have some historical significance ([1], [2], [3]) that lead me to want to see it preserved somewhere in projectspace (with a protected redirect).  · Salvidrim! ·  03:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • To expand, I think there needs to be a short essay at WP:InstallAware Software describing its significance (add to essays listed at NCORP), then the draftspace title redirected and FPP'ed (the essay can link to the latest diff). I volunteer to implement that if the closer wants me to.  · Salvidrim! ·  03:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Salvidrim. This is a unique case. To avoid other companies from trying to go this route, blank and protect it. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 17:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It feels weird keeping this in draftspace indefinitely, even blanked and protected. Wouldn't it be better to preserve this piece of WP history as part of an essay of some kind? We could incorporate the citations Salvidrim mentioned. ♠PMC(talk) 02:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.