Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Fuddle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:31, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fuddle[edit]

Delete per this discussion. [1] Legacypac (talk) 08:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Though I think it may be difficult to create an article on this topic due to WP:NOTDICT, I don't think it's completely implausible. Some better sources would be needed. Only ~6 months old. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 03:06, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a single local term with a single marginal source. Absent better sources, not much point. --Calton | Talk 12:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't this a G13 candidate? Delete. VQuakr (talk) 01:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.