Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Frank Graewe
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Redirect. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Submitted and declined 8 times; at some point we have to put down the horse. Concerns have been raised from sourcing to notability. Basically it boils down to the fact that the subject only shows up in print due to his involvement in one event, which disqualifies him from having an article per WP:BLP1E. Primefac (talk) 17:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Penis_transplantation#2014_procedure_in_South_Africa, per the top reviewer's comment and consistent with all reviewer comments. An accidental content fork. Keep the redirect with history, the redirect points future visitors to this draft page to the proper place, and there may be something non redundant in the references used. No BLP issues, it is only a WP:BIO issue. BLP1E and BIO1E demand consideration of a merge and redirect WP:BEFORE nominating for deletion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Um... SmokeyJoe, I'm honestly just trying to sort out your plan. Are you saying that we turn this draft into a redirect? Or are you saying that we should accept this draft, move it to article space, and then turn it into a redirect? Primefac (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Turn the draft into a redirect. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Um... SmokeyJoe, I'm honestly just trying to sort out your plan. Are you saying that we turn this draft into a redirect? Or are you saying that we should accept this draft, move it to article space, and then turn it into a redirect? Primefac (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- I think we could show notability. I'm going to check further. DGG ( talk ) 01:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Even if you could demonstrate independent notability, which I doubt, I think the subject is better covered in the context of the article Penis_transplantation. The possibility of a spin out could later be discussed at Talk:Penis_transplantation. It should be done this way to avoid content forking. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.