Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Eze Ejike

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. The draft namespace is still relatively new, but unless I'm much mistaken, it doesn't imply anything different than a userspace draft. They're not indexed by search engines, for example. So I can't see the merit in moving this to userspace, where it's even less likely to attract collaborators. --BDD (talk) 16:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Eze Ejike[edit]

Fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL JMHamo (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Is it even allowed to nominate a draft under these conditions? --Mr. Guye (talk) 00:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr. Guye: - Why wait 6 months for it to be deleted by G13, when it can go sooner... Eze Ejike is not notable, and probably never will be... JMHamo (talk) 00:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mr. Guye is a minor, please keep this in mind when discussing here. JMHamo (talk) 00:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JMHamo:: Your argument reads like WP:NEGLECT to me. --Mr. Guye (talk) 00:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this is a draft created two days ago, it could well be a work in progress - far too soon to be deleting. Giant Snowman 10:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Move to User:Mr. Guye's userspace. The subject is not currently notable, but I don't see why Mr. Guye can't work on the article in his own userspace until such time that Ejike is notable. – Pee Jay 14:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@PeeJay2K3: I'm not the creator...ScarTissue101 is. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. In that case, I suggest the page be moved to User:ScarTissue101's userspace. – Pee Jay 21:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to User:ScarTissue101 user space (first choice), or Keep (second choice). There may be more information we can't see yet. Besides, it's still in draft form. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 17:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and absolutely do not move it. It is in draft space, where drafts belong, so what is the problem here? jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 22:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Surely the Draft space is only for articles that can prove notability but aren't ready for publication yet? There's literally no evidence that this subject is notable. – PeeJay 12:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - My Keep is partly procedural; we simply don't have to evaluate notability after few days a new draft is created, and in dealing with new users such haste is usually counterproductive and WP:BITE. I agree with user GiantSnowMan here. We can wait for the regular G13 cleanup here. Also, if the subject is not notable, then why are you advocating moving the draft into a different location in first place? Userspace is not a free webhost for posting materials that are not valid drafts or otherwise useful for building the encyclopedia. If it is not a valid draft, then it has no business existing anywhere in Wikipedia. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 13:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.