Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Encanto
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: speedy redirect Draft:Encanto (film) to Draft:Encanto. Redirecting from one draft to another generally shouldn't require an MFD if they cover the same subject material. In the case of a copy/paste page move from article to draft space, it's likely that the draft is being worked on, but otherwise it can also just be redirected back to the original article. Primefac (talk) 15:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
As a result of a lot of malformed moves, it seems that this draft has been existing in two locations: Draft:Encanto and Draft:Encanto (film). Considering that this one is now just a replication of the disambiguation page located at Encanto, there is no need for it. Not to mention it will remove the temptation to restart another copy of the same draft. BOVINEBOY2008 20:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Redirect Draft:Encanto to Encanto. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Draft:Encanto (film). It wasn't nominated, and should not have been nominated. It is too soon to be reviewed and belongs in draft space where it is. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Rerdirect Draft:Encanto to Encanto. Keep Draft:Encanto (film) if that is considered to be under discussion here. Both as per Robert McClenon. The redir could and should have been done without starting an MfD. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- The only reason I brought it to MfD is because some of the editors of the article have a habit of reaching into the history of a draft and reviving it despite checking to see if it has been moved. Deleting it with it's history would prevent that. BOVINEBOY2008 14:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Draft:Encanto (film) as the history clearly points to a second draft for the film. Disambiguation for the term has been around before this draft, so it was not developed as history as a disambiguation page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete which is soon going to happen since I nominated it for copy-paste move CSD (G6). 🐔 Chicdat ChickenDatabase 11:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- It has been deleted as G6. I have asked the deleting admin to restore and allow this discussion to proceed. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 01:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- The deletion has been undone. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.