Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Elder Ufot Ebong
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep . Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Elder Ufot Ebong[edit]
The Article fails to meet WP:GNC as mentioned by Theroadislong. There are barley any adequate sources for this article. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete low level govt official. Likely self promotion Legacypac (talk) 22:05, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Neutral - No need to delete yet, because just draftified out of article space, and has not yet been submitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep – A state-level appointee may meet the NBIO criteria, depending on whether some GNG support can be found. The draft has several failings and was properly draftified out of article space. Unless the policy has changed without my noticing, we do not delete a draft at MfD for failing to establish notability, especially such a new draft. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:39, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - We want to entice new editors here not scare them off!, Currently being worked on so keep. –Davey2010Talk 20:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- User:David Biddulph chose to draftify this instead of AfD or PROD, he should be notified of this MfD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.