Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Diligent Blesslee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Unproven-at-the-time sock accusation and accusation of hopelessness were not accepted by other participants as good reasons to delete this draft. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 08:07, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Diligent Blesslee[edit]

This is recreation of recently deleted article as per G11 Deletion Log , also identified author used multiple accounts editing this article. Deleted article created by 074arjun (Log), this draft created by David81KL . edits using both accounts this draft page related, could be a sockpuppet situation and again clearly shows creator of the article has against wikipedia policy per COI , G11 .

Another issues regarding this article; subject does not meet WP:NMUSIC / WP:COMPOSER because there are no works in multiple notable productions other than being a participant of a reality shows. The subject also lacks significant coverage WP:SIGCOV. Apparently one of the contestant of Bigg Boss which is alone not sufficient for notability per WP:BIGBROTHER -Joxin 05:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Clearly shows recreation of article against wikipedia policy per COI , G11 . -Joxin 05:41, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Lack of notability is a reason to decline or reject a draft, not to delete it. Sockpuppetry is a reason to delete a draft, but the SPI is still open. Previous deletion is only a reason to delete a draft if G4 applies, but it does not. The promotional tone is not sufficient to warrant deletion, only to warrant declining if submitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Resolve SOCK concerns first. Do not use MfD to enforce SOCK allegations. At a glance, the draft looks ok. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Notability isn't an issue for MfD; recreating a G11 is fine so long as the recreated version isn't G11-eligible; sockpuppetry only comes into play if the editor is evading a block (which hasn't been shown here) and should be dealt with using SPI and WP:G5. As is usually the case, this draft isn't in bad enough shape to require MfD deletion; the usual processes (AfC declines and WP:G13) are adequate here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.