Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Defacto Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 23:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Defacto Technologies[edit]

Deleted 3 times as A7/G11, A7 and another A7. And still recreated with poor content, unreliable source. There's no notability here only repeatedly failed attempts to create notability. I hope it get deleted here and possibly salt the title Ammarpad (talk) 11:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt per nom. Non-notable cruft of interest only to shareholders. — fortunavelut luna 11:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Privately held, actually. VQuakr (talk) 02:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy deletions were not recent and were different versions under the same name, so they don't really inform a !vote here. The company is based in Grenoble so it seems likely that better coverage might be available in French sources; however, I see a lone source from Le Dauphiné libéré in fr.Google news and pretty typical press-release sources in French and English. So, it seems likely that an article on this subject would not make it through an AfD on grounds of notability - a criterion that doesn't apply to drafts. So neither of the criteria presented in the nomination really pan out as reason for deletion, but unless something dramatically changes about the subject there is near-zero chance of it successfully leaving Draft purgatory... so weak delete without salting either here or in mainspace. VQuakr (talk) 02:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, the spammy format likely was inherited from Invionics, which has managed to survive in article space for 3 years despite similar problems. I shall start an AfD on that one shortly. VQuakr (talk) 02:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.