Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cuentame (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cuentame[edit]

The first MfD attracted no interest and was closed no consensus, but both this page and its talk page are being used by IPs as web-hosts for fantasy games. Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. JohnCD (talk) 16:31, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Note to User:Whpq, nominator of MfD1. A weak nomination statement does not make for easy review. If the nominator would make decisive statements (not "appears" and "I do not think"), then the question to review is "I sthe nominator right or not?" Otherwise, the MfD reviewer has to repeat the investigation fresh. That can be too much work. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The original nomination is as definitive as it could be as the subject matter is related to a Spanish language show and I am not conversant in Spanish. -- Whpq (talk) 12:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as use of the page for web-hosting a hodge-podge of material. -- Whpq (talk) 12:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not suitable as an article, and the editing activity on it is not making it any more suitable. --RL0919 (talk) 02:58, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.