Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Christto & Andrew
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: speedy redirect to Christto & Andrew. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle (talk) 18:28, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Housekeeping - exists in mainspace at Christto & Andrew Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- just redirect or ignore and it will be swept away in 6 months. Legacypac (talk) 07:27, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Redirect from draft space to article space. The draft and the article are primarily by the same person and are mostly the same, which is what would have happened if the draft had been accepted. There are a few editors who think that redirects from draft space to article space are problematic. They are not, although the reverse are. The usual action when a draft and an article both exist is to redirect the draft to the article, which is what is done if a draft is accepted. (If a draft is accepted, the redirect from draft space to article space is left standing indefinitely. It does no harm and may be good.) Robert McClenon (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment for User:Gbawden - Your nomination was well-meaning but not necessary. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.