Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Catchfood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Catchfood[edit]

The overall tone of this draft and the username of the creator (who was reported at UAA) have convinced me that this draft seems to be a case of covert advertising. However, I thought it wiser to bring this to MfD than tag it with G11 as it is not a blatant advertisement. Java Hurricane 08:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, concur that it's advertising (covert or otherwise). creffett (talk) 13:40, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - 7 declines is more than enough to be tiresome and tendentious. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Promotionally written, repeatedly resubmitted without improvement (only minor changes such as this), and does not seem to be a notable topic. The current sourcing is just advertisements by the company itself. Glades12 (talk) 08:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Page submitter is clearly more interested in advertising than contributing. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.