Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cary and Michael Huang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. Disruption. Star Mississippi 17:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cary and Michael Huang[edit]

Draft:Cary and Michael Huang (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Part of the ongoing BFDI onslaught. Should be deleted and salted as yet another attempt to Trojan this non-notable topic into Wikipedia. Dronebogus (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

25 February 2022: Rejected by myself, notes posted on why reject https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Cary_and_Michael_Huang&oldid=1073974665
11 September 2022: submitted by account later blocked as WP:NOTHERE: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Cary_and_Michael_Huang&oldid=1109779041, also attempt to directly place article in mainspace, which was speedied
16 November 2022: Attempted by 27 is the best number, CSD G4 was declined by Liz with recommendation to rewrite https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Cary_and_Michael_Huang&oldid=1122126015
9 January 2023: submitted by IP, soon blocked 6 months as block evasion https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Cary_and_Michael_Huang&oldid=1132586948 AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 22:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle For Dream Island (BFDI) AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 22:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. I helped write some of the non-BFDI parts of this draft a long while back, but while doing so, I discovered there really just aren't any sources that give the brothers notability. I think there might be enough sources sometime in a few years to make Cary and his various weird web projects notable, but when that happens, editors can just go through the process to unsalt the page. Seems like it's worth it to salt it now, given the apparently constant attempts to shove BFDI-related stuff through the wiki process using articles like this. So weird, apparently it's up there with Chris-Chan in the "perennial requests" page. HappyWith (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Of all the BFDI-related pages, this one had the most potential to be legit, but still could not find any GNG articles even after the brothers went through college and had posted the Scale of the Universe models. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 14:50, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and salt - nothing here worth keeping. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.