Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Aron Wright (Songwriter)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aron Wright (Songwriter)[edit]

Draft:Aron Wright (Songwriter) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aron Wright (songwriter). K.e.coffman (talk) 02:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete this draft only has 24 refs instead of 106 but the place to make the case on notablity was at the recent AfD. Legacypac (talk) 03:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral - It's already been rejected. Is there a reason to kill it a second time? Robert McClenon (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Since the subject was deleted from mainspace via AfD, I don't see a point in keeping the draft around. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I suggest that when a qualified reviewer rejects a draft on a topic previously deleted at AfD, it should be deleted. Maybe G8. Maybe a new criterion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:39, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
SmokeyJoe, the reviewer could apply CSD WP:G4 if the version submitted was the same as the AFD'ed version. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:33, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
G4 in drafts space is dubious. There have been inconclusive discussions on this. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:57, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.